Coin vs. Card vs. App Payments: Revenue, Data, and Risk
Most laundromats run several payment methods at once. In the CLA's 2024 survey, 71% of respondents accepted quarters, 42% laundry cards, 42% credit or debit, 25% smartphone wallets, and 25% a proprietary app. Only 21% were quarter-only. The market is hybrid, and the meaningful difference between methods is the reporting each produces.
Key takeaways
- The market is hybrid. Only 21% quarter-only and 12% card-only among surveyed respondents.
- Responses overlap — the percentages cannot be added, and the industry is not cashless.
- Data is the real differentiator. Card and app systems record machine-level cycle revenue; coin does not.
- Each method has a distinct cost profile, and none is universally cheaper.
- Fully cashless carries volume risk in trade areas with lower banking access.
Adoption, With the Caveat
| Method accepted | Share of respondents |
|---|---|
| Quarters | 71% |
| Laundry cards | 42% |
| Credit / debit cards | 42% |
| Smartphone wallets | 25% |
| Proprietary mobile app | 25% |
| Quarter-only | 21% |
| Laundry-card-only | 12% |
Source: CLA 2024 Laundry Industry Survey, 377 owner respondents, 2023 operations. Multiple responses were allowed. These percentages must not be added together, and the market must not be described as fully cashless — most stores accept several methods.
For scale alongside those figures, the same survey put the median store at 62 machines in 2,740 square feet producing $335,000 of 2023 gross revenue (Source: CLA 2024 Laundry Industry Survey). Payment hardware is priced per machine, so a store's machine count drives conversion cost as directly as its revenue does.
The Three Methods
Coin. Quarters in a drop. Universal accessibility, no processing fees, no network dependency, and no data. The costs are changer maintenance, coin handling and banking time, and theft exposure at the changer and during collection.
Card. A stored-value card, loaded at a kiosk or online, read at each machine. Produces machine-level data, allows remote price changes, reduces cash on site, and creates a stored-value liability. Costs hardware installed plus processing and support.
App. Mobile payment from the customer's phone, using a module at the machine. Removes the physical card and often the kiosk, produces the same class of data, and depends on the customer having a smartphone and a linked payment method.
Most stores that adopt card or app keep coin on at least some machines. That is not indecision — it is accessibility management.
What Each Produces for a Transaction
This is the difference that matters most, and it is not about customer convenience.
| Method | Data produced | Verification value |
|---|---|---|
| Coin | Collection totals only, if logged | Low unless logs are rigorous and consistent |
| Card | Machine-level cycle revenue, starts, price history, refunds, promotions, management starts, settlements | High |
| App | Same class of data, plus customer-level detail | High |
A coin store's revenue can only be corroborated through deposits, a physical rebuild, water consumption, and attended collections. A card or app store adds an independent, machine-level record that reconciles against processor settlements.
Since evidence quality is the driver that most reliably moves a store through the 2.72x-4.50x multiple range, the data is worth more at sale than the convenience is worth in operation.
The Terms That Must Be Separated
Card and app reports are easy to misread. Six distinctions:
- Stored-value load — a customer adding money to a card or account. A liability, not revenue.
- Cycle revenue — a machine running a paid cycle. This is revenue.
- Management / test start — a free start by the operator. Exclude.
- Promotion / free dry — depresses revenue against usage; identify by period.
- Refund — reduces revenue.
- Unsettled transaction — authorized but not settled at period end; a timing difference.
A store growing its card base shows loads exceeding cycle revenue; one where customers are drawing down balances shows the reverse. Neither is a problem. Reporting either as revenue without the distinction is.
Cost Profiles
There is no universal answer to which is cheaper, and any page claiming one is generalizing across very different stores.
| Cost | Coin | Card / app |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware | Included with machines; changers | Readers per machine, kiosk, networking — four to five figures installed |
| Transaction cost | None | Processing fees per transaction or per load |
| Handling | Collection, counting, banking time | Minimal, but kiosks still hold cash |
| Maintenance | Changers, coin drops, jams | Readers, network, software support |
| Theft exposure | Real, at changers and in transit | Reduced, but not eliminated |
| Liability created | None | Outstanding stored-value balances |
| Owner time | Significant, ongoing | Lower, once established |
The item most often left out of the comparison is owner time. Collections, counting, and banking are hours every week. An owner valuing their own time at zero will conclude coin is cheaper; one valuing it honestly frequently will not.
Accessibility Is a Real Constraint
Removing cash entirely is a decision about customers, not technology.
In trade areas with lower banking access, a share of customers pay in cash because that is what they have. A store that removes the option loses those customers to the next store that has not — and the lost volume appears in the trailing twelve months the store will eventually be valued on.
The common compromise: keep coin on some machines, or install a cash-to-card kiosk so customers can convert cash to stored value on site. That preserves accessibility while capturing most of the data benefit.
Practical Guidance
If you own a coin store and plan to sell within a year: do not convert. You will pay for it and capture none of the data benefit, and the transition disruption lands in the period you are valued on. Instead, tighten collection logs and deposit reconciliation, which achieve much of the same verification effect for free.
If you are 12 or more months out: conversion is worth considering, primarily for the reporting. Keep a cash path.
If you are buying a card or app store: confirm hardware ownership, whether the operator account and machine mapping transfer, the processing agreement's fees and assignment terms, and the outstanding stored-value balance — which should be adjusted at closing.
If you are buying a coin store: expect to do more verification work, budget for attended collections across several weeks, and price the evidence gap rather than assuming the revenue is wrong.
Summary
The industry runs a hybrid payment mix, not a cashless one. Coin offers universal accessibility and almost no data; card and app offer machine-level reporting that makes revenue verifiable, at the cost of hardware, processing fees, and a stored-value liability. The reporting is worth more at sale than the convenience is in operation — and removing cash entirely is a customer decision that deserves more thought than it usually gets.
The Next Step
Frequently Asked Questions
What payment methods do laundromats actually accept?
Most accept several. In the CLA's 2024 survey, 71% of respondents accepted quarters, 42% laundry cards, 42% credit or debit, 25% smartphone wallets, and 25% a proprietary app. Only 21% were quarter-only and 12% card-only, and the responses overlap because stores combine methods.
Is app payment replacing cards?
Not replacing — adding. Twenty-five percent of respondents accepted smartphone wallets and 25% offered a proprietary app, alongside higher card and coin acceptance. App payment removes the need for a physical card and a value kiosk, which suits some stores and not others.
Which method produces the best data?
Card and app systems, because they record machine-level cycle revenue, starts, price changes, refunds, promotions, and management starts. Coin produces almost no data beyond what a collection log records, which is why coin stores carry a heavier verification burden at sale.
What does each method cost?
Coin costs changer maintenance, coin handling time, banking, and theft exposure. Card and app cost hardware installed, ongoing processing fees, network and support. There is no universal comparison — it depends on volume, the processing agreement, and how you value your own collection time.
Should a store go fully cashless?
Rarely without care. Removing cash entirely in a trade area with lower banking access can lose real volume, and that loss shows up in the trailing twelve months a store is valued on. Most converted stores keep coin on some machines or install a cash-to-card kiosk.
Sources
- Coin Laundry Association, 2024 Laundry Industry Survey (377 owner respondents, 2023 operations) — https://member.laundryassociation.org/hubfs/IndustrySurvey24.pdf
- Laundroworks, reporting definitions — https://support.laundroworks.com/portal/en/kb/articles/reporting-in-the-laundroportal
- PayRange, Remote Pay setup — https://support.payrange.com/hc/en-us/articles/28567592867981-Remote-Pay-Set-Up
- SpyderWash reports — https://spyderwash.info/help/reports/
- FasCard product page — https://www.laundrycard.com/products/fascard/
This page is general information about laundromat transactions, not legal, tax, or investment advice, and not a guarantee of sale price, timing, or financing approval. Verify current rules with your own CPA, attorney, lender, and the relevant state or municipal agency before acting.